ThePanda

March 20, 2006

New Dorm B

Filed under: article — aurojit @ 6:47 pm

Ever since I have come to Brown, I have been a supporter for classes promoting interaction amongst students, often believing the level of interaction a class allows as being one of the yardsticks for judging how much I am going to like it. Well turns out that so far I have been going by the wrong definitions, and what I really like is freedom, the freedom to decide if I interact and share information or not, and I am sad to report I absolutely suck at forced collaboration, for I cannot work with everyone, and everyone cannot work with me, and in as homogenous population as a class, it is quite possible that there is no one I would really love to work with but myself. Which brings us to the obvious moral issue of whether I am selfish, and I shall skip that one.

I am living in New Dorm B next year, which is precisely where I wanted to end up, so wooohoooo on that one, two years of good housing feels good :D . I need to watch more Gilbert and Sullivan, as a recent viewing of the Pirates of Penzance, proved. This was meant to be a huge, elaborate entry, but I just got back from the housing lottery, and this gets posted up there.

Ze Panda

March 17, 2006

Some CS, and other things

Filed under: Observances, article — aurojit @ 12:18 am

Tuxes and books, that’s what it is all about, tuxes and books. OK so it is about more than those two, but they seem to be important this week. Oh meeting with professors (in the plural), going to weird things, interviewing for jobs that I will obviously not get, and coding in groups are amongst other dominant themes this week. But then again, a lot of these are me making predictions, as opposed to much of anything else, and unlike certain physicists who publish strange sounding papers in Nature, which then lead to an explosion in cognitive science papers exploring such questions as how long we will live, the time period for which Nature will be published, and future frontiers in inter-galactic travel, I am not trained in such arts. I am at best an ad-hoc Bayesian person, and that isn’t good enough. Oh and Nature gets published for anywhere between another 140 and 4000 years, we really don’t have colonies in the galaxy, and umm the theory isn’t doing so well, since it needs to be contradicted in fewer than the next 100 years, and should it not be contradicted, it self contradicts, and is thus wrong. So much for statistics and Bayesian inference, as the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy mentions, should anyone come close to understanding the real nature of the universe, the universe ceases to exist, and is quickly replaced by something even more ununderstandable.

There are somethings which are less understandable as a CS person than anyone else, or so I am told anyways. One of these is non-zero ordering, like tell a CS person about the Korean system of accounting for ages (add 1 to your age, that’s your Korean age), and the usual response (unless you are lucky) is something of why the hell would anyone do this, tell anyone in the non-CS world about this, and the possible response is a meh. CS people do zero ordering, zero ordering is cool, is cool anyways unless you happen to be one of those JDBC people connecting to PostgreSQL, in which case all your columns have to be 1 ordered, never quite understood this, but there always has to be this one thing which breaks with whatever you consider standard, strange but true.

Weeks can be remembered for many things, two of them are things attended and things missed. This week has had its bad moments in more than one way, but what makes it truly sucky is all that I missed, and not all of it was missed because I was busy in other pursuits. I know the entire what’s done is done thing, but these seem to be hard things to look beyond. So yesterday, Jorge Cham, who writes the usually funny, and wonderful Piled Higher and Deeper was in town, and I have been telling people for ages about how he never comes to Brown, but goes to all the other colleges which are near. Did I attend, nopes, did I have other things to do, nopes, did I notice the fact that Brown was mentioned in huge characters right above the strip, nopes, sucks. Then there is Andy Hertzfield, the guy who created folklore.org, and parts of the Mac, and is a Brown alum, and has a few Brown stories somewhere in there, was here, he works for Google now, and was perhaps here because of them, but either ways, he was here. I had this one on my calendar forever, it met at the same time as Cog Sci, but we could find ways around that, well turns out I couldn’t, so bah on that. Bah I say, bah.

Ze Panda

March 15, 2006

This is not a Link Blog

Filed under: Links, article — aurojit @ 6:10 pm

Sometimes I collect links, hoping to litter my blog entries with them, but then I never get around to writing this epic blog entry with links. So I shall provide links, one happy and unhappy, and promise to write later.

Unhappy: This was one of my favorite opinion pieces coming out of Milosevic’s death. It is long, but it tries to look at things in terms of history, and while providing some judgement of whether he was a monster or not, often looks at everything else in there.

Happy: Roomba Frogger is a game using Roomba’s and the road, you probably shouldn’t be playing it, but it sure as hell looks fun.

Ze Panda
PS: There’s a new EPIC video, for those who remember the old one, this one covers an extra year, ends strangely (and somewhat abruptly), is more factually correct for 2004, though not for 2005. That being said, it is nice.

March 6, 2006

On e-mail and the JCE

Filed under: article — aurojit @ 2:15 pm

This goes back a long time. A long time ago I didn’t access the internet at home (ya this happened), and had to go to my father’s office to do as much, this involved a weekend excursion every Saturday, when I did stuff on the ‘net. This of course is in sharp contrast from now, when I can’t get away from the net even if I tried, what with being paid to check e-mails, and being graded with abilities to crawl the ‘net. So basically, compared to the me a long time ago, I am currently a ‘net demon, or a ‘net daemon, depending on how well you like CS puns. But ya that being said, back then it was OK for me to not answer e-mails for large swaths of time, something about not getting to them often enough. Fast forward a few years, and I had a ‘net connection, albeit a slow one, at home, and I could answer e-mails day and night should I chose to, I however eventually went into this lazy state where I never really did, it just wasn’t worth the effort if I didn’t really need to. This changed when I met a few people from my past, realized not receiving responses usually sucked, and began meticulously replying every e-mail which could be replied to, at my peak, any e-mail sent to me, was generally replied to within the next 6 hours.

Fast e-mail replies are a good thing, I enjoy them, however they don’t always work out. Receiving over 20 repliable e-mail messages a day, pretty much means every time I am sitting at a computer, and check my e-mail, I am guaranteed to have at least one new e-mail looking for attention. And post being a TA for a course which is actually hard for some people, and which has actual issues with pretty much everything, getting e-mails and replying to e-mails is as much a job as anything else. Well folks, what’s my job, remains my job, that being said, I am anouncing an end to my previous e-mail policy. I will reply to almost every e-mail I can send a reply to, if I can’t, I won’t. Pretty much everyone knows that an e-mail like “Hi, I bought a new _” can’t be replied to in very much detail, and it will sit in my mailbox for a while beofre getting replied. I know this is a bad thing, I expect replies to my e-mails, instant ones at that, but honestly not many people send those out, and I really don’t want to think of replies to certain e-mails when I receive them.

In other news, I just got done with writing stuff out about public-key cryptography and the stuff that goes with it. Observations on doing so, and from past attempts at reading cryptographic algorithms seems to indicate that abstract algebra seems to help with most of this stuff, which makes me wonder why the CS department isn’t passing all CS concentrators through abstract algebra, because honestly writing out slides which explain abstract algebra at a lightening quick pace isn’t very simple, and I am honestly not that good at it. Another observation invoves the fact that I had to, in one way or the other, refer to the JCE, something I wasn’t very happy about, because I really don’t know that much about it, and it is another one of those Java things that uses strings in weird ways. But more so than just a design resentment, some of my dislike for JCE is far more deep seated, and stems from an inability to use it in the past, especially because it was placed under highly restrective export control regulations, and I really wasn’t in a country where they allowed the use of JCE. Now this should not be a problem, because I understand some of their reasons for doing so, but it still makes me wonder about how many things I do not really want to place on slides or other things because of personal dislike, and whether this is even fair to anyone. Key Eschrow mechanisms for instance, is a topic I feel should be on any cryptography lecture, not only because it is important, but because at one point in time, there were multiple countries considering its use, so that people could be assured privacy, and yet law enforcement would not be hindered. I am not sure how this works in the current scenario.

I am staying in Providence for Spring Break, which is another 3 weeks away, I really want time to do stuff, and most people I know are heading home for the break, which sort of makes sense.

Ze Panda

Powered by WordPress